TENIR Labs · Products

Answers for different situations

Start with what is happening.

Each offer is presented plainly: the problem it addresses, what it produces and what it does not claim. The 2×2 matrix below is only a summary.

Recap · choose a starting point

Before or after the action?

Start with the situation you recognize. Each profile then explains its output, status and limits.

Before AI acts · understand

An AI tool or use appears. You want to know what it can affect and who should look.

  • Map an AI useREG Discovery · Experimental deterministic engine · Working Draft · draft site PR #13
  • Spot existing exposureAI Exposure X-Ray · X-Ray v0.2 prototype · favorable internal assessment · not production-qualified

Before AI acts · prepare

A decision is being prepared. You need to know what to check before the action goes out.

After an action · understand

An action happened. You need to separate what was intended, sent, confirmed or remains unknown.

After an action · verify

A sensitive action needs a declared frame and a clear response when you do not yet know what happened.

TENIR frames the question; products and services address different moments. A simulation is not proof of production.

Start with a guided diagnostic · Why now?

To understand or prepare

Choose the situation that looks like yours, then open one profile at a time.

Product or instrument

REG Prevent

A requirement to apply. What needs to be checked?

This may concern you if…

During design, after a rule changes or when reviewing the controls around an important action.

What it provides

Candidate control map, critical assumptions, risk questions and proposed REG Prevention Brief.

Read v0.1 working draft Working Draft, not a deployed pilot
In explorationWorking Draft v0.1 · bounded pilot approachView profile →
Product or instrument

REG Prepare

What can we actually demonstrate?

This may concern you if…

Before a review, launch or audit, after an incident, or when a decision depends on evidence that needs to be found.

What it provides

Evidence Readiness Pack, qualified claim matrix, unknowns and verification plan.

Read v0.1 working draft Working Draft, not an actual audit
In explorationWorking Draft v0.1 · bounded pilot approachView profile →
Product or instrument

REG Explorer v0.2

Explore assumptions and boundaries before making an architecture decision.

This may concern you if…

When a team needs to explore governance boundaries and make technical questions testable.

What it provides

Dependency exploration and verification questions; public release remains gated by final browser acceptance.

In explorationv0.2 prototype · READY WITH CONDITIONS · final browser test pendingView profile →
Product or instrument

REG Discovery

Could an important assumption be missing?

This may concern you if…

At the start of a review, when a requirement seems obvious or when preparing questions to verify.

What it provides

Bounded assumption catalogue, deterministic exploration and printable report; five source cards and 31 combinations described in the draft web PR.

In explorationExperimental deterministic engine · Working Draft · draft site PR #13View profile →
Product or instrument

REG Mediation

Propose PREVENT / PREPARE responses without presenting proposals as admissions.

This may concern you if…

Comparing interpretations before formal review of candidate constraints.

What it provides

Traceable proposed controls pending qualification; no automatically admitted properties.

In explorationExperimental prototype · proposals not admittedView profile →
Product or instrument

AI Exposure X-Ray

Is AI already part of the everyday tools?

This may concern you if…

When preparing an inventory of AI uses, an AI policy or the scope of a diagnostic.

What it provides

Exploratory exposure view and prioritized verification questions.

Explore three examples Editorial examples, not the X-Ray v0.2 engine
In explorationX-Ray v0.2 prototype · favorable internal assessment · not production-qualifiedView profile →
Product or instrument

REG Translation Studio

Understand a requirement and make it testable.

This may concern you if…

When a requirement is ambiguous or needs to be testable, while keeping proposed interpretation separate from validation.

What it provides

Traceable candidate constraints and ambiguity log for qualified review.

Read REG principles Framing reference, not executable prototype
In explorationExploratory prototype · preparing internal testingView profile →
Product or instrument

TENIR-Gov v5.7.0

Before an agent acts, examine what authorizes it.

This may concern you if…

When a technical team prepares an agent action on an external system and can verify the specific deployment conditions.

What it provides

Scoped local decisions, reservations and reconciliation records—not automatic proof of external provider effects.

TENIR-Gov v5.7.0 release Bounded single-host beta, no C3
Published · precise scopeReleased open-source beta · bounded single-hostView profile →
Product or instrument

REG Conformance v0.6.1

Test one bounded execution-governance profile against reproducible contracts.

This may concern you if…

Testing the exact single-host loopback Raft profile covered by the release.

What it provides

Profile-scoped test results and badge; no inherited guarantees for other topologies.

REG Conformance v0.6.1 release 46/46 PASS for single-host loopback Raft profile only
In explorationv0.6.1 released · 46/46 PASS · single-host loopback Raft profileView profile →

Explore the foundations

Architecture, texts and technical contracts to read.

Framework and research

REG-ARCH

Requirements, actions and evidence: how do they connect?

This may concern you if…

When architects need to connect claims, actions and their representation across Claim, Action and Representation.

What it provides

Conceptual map and typed transition model to compare with versioned source specifications.

In explorationArchitecture foundation · working specificationView profile →
Framework and research

REG+ & RFCs · Contracts and foundations

Under which conditions does a guarantee hold?

This may concern you if…

When checking an invariant, profile, test or the deployment conditions a guarantee depends on.

What it provides

Specification and candidate profiles, attributable test outcomes and known gaps.

Read the REG standard Reference contracts, not deployment conformance
In explorationREG+ / RFC reference foundations · distinct from released Conformance toolView profile →

Still not sure which one fits?

Describe what you are trying to understand. A few lines are enough to start a conversation.

Open the contact page →