Clarify an outcome
It acted. You have no confirmation.
You do not need the explanation before you begin. Let’s look at what the available evidence establishes.
Sources and reading context
Reading guide to TENIR pages and demonstrations. Detailed sources are identified on each linked resource.
Simplified public rendering, read on 19 October 2026. KB3: enacted, active doctrinal rendering line. It renders meaning; it is not the code, and not a constitution. KB2: prior rendering line. This site certifies no implementation. Read the detailed status →
On this page
A recorded call, a missing response, partial logs: these do not necessarily tell the same story. They can be distinguished before deciding what comes next.
A missing response does not prove that the action failed.
A draft to review. Nothing sent automatically.
Questions you might have
What are we trying to distinguish?
Authorization of the action, dispatch of the request and confirmation of the outcome. A trace can establish one of these facts without establishing the others.
See uncertainty in the demo →Demo · EnglishI only have partial traces. Is that a problem?
It is a limit to make visible. The diagnostic can conclude “not established with available evidence” and identify what information is missing. Start by describing what you have.
See how unknowns are presented →Sourced sheetDoes TENIR resolve the incident automatically?
The diagnostic prepares a human decision within a written scope. It does not replace the person responsible for resuming. Site demonstrations do not operate your system.
What about before letting an agent act? →Another angleChoose what comes next
Would a concrete situation help you explore?
See more situations →Your situation does not fit these examples?
Describe it in your own words →